Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 20 |
161. Concerning the allegations of event rigging - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: Revan Neferis This is an ooc thread and the fact that I was involved in a rp event where my enemies received faction and replacement of ships while a wars has nothing to do with wether you are PIE or Sani Sabik. i agree...
- by Udyr Vulpayne - at 2007.05.28 19:53:00
|
162. Concerning the allegations of event rigging - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Edited by: Udyr Vulpayne on 28/05/2007 19:12:36 Originally by: Revan Neferis No, I was very happy to spend billions against the amarrians at the wars while Tetrimon was giving billions to AM in gifts to replace their loses. your f...
- by Udyr Vulpayne - at 2007.05.28 19:13:00
|
163. Why are Amarr so bad? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Edited by: Udyr Vulpayne on 28/05/2007 17:16:02 Originally by: Jaketh Ivanes Imo, the 10% cap reduction bonus is fine and good. We could trade that for a RoF/Dam/Tracking bonus if they reduced the base cap use and removed the build in...
- by Udyr Vulpayne - at 2007.05.28 17:17:00
|
164. Concerning the allegations of event rigging - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: Aunty Entity In the gallente elections event good job at picking an event were ccp/aurora have already admitted that they failed to deliver and eventually just went for a quick end of it after neglecting it for ages. thi...
- by Udyr Vulpayne - at 2007.05.28 16:19:00
|
165. Concerning the allegations of event rigging - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: Karlemgne The original complaint was that CCP mislead members of the RPing community by suggesting that players had an effect on the outcome of story arcs, when in reality those story arcs had a pre-determined outcome. ...
- by Udyr Vulpayne - at 2007.05.28 15:43:00
|
166. Loyalty to the Covenant - in Intergalactic Summit [original thread]
Originally by: Casserina Leshrac I would suggest you try looking at Bloodveil, the executor corp of the The Sani Sabik Alliance. didnt you guy just recently proclaim to have nothing at all to do with omirs little cult? or was that an...
- by Udyr Vulpayne - at 2007.05.23 00:09:00
|
167. CCP, when do consider your server design a failure? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Robert Dobbs - If all users were within VISUAL RANGE of each other (i.e interacting), NETWORK TRAFFIC would be infinately greater and that right there is the main reason to use one server per system. when you get loa...
- by Udyr Vulpayne - at 2007.05.14 23:57:00
|
168. [Battle Report] CVA Capital Shipyard destroyed. - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
Edited by: Udyr Vulpayne on 13/05/2007 13:47:45 Originally by: Fear Not You did try to defend that POS, otherwise you wouldn't have had so many in that system (including IAC!!!), bubbles on the gate, and such. Saying otherwise is just...
- by Udyr Vulpayne - at 2007.05.13 13:49:00
|
169. [Battle Report] CVA Capital Shipyard destroyed. - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: Eddie Gordo We killed a capital shipyard. you killed an un-onlined tower. Theres a difference, dont pretend there isnt. both sides killed a pos that was not defended. now we're back to 4 cva towers (1 reinforced) and ze...
- by Udyr Vulpayne - at 2007.05.13 13:10:00
|
170. A call for debate on the Imperial Succession - in Intergalactic Summit [original thread]
It's quiet easy to see that you are amarrian by birth. The question is whether or not you have fallen from faith. You may not realize it but you are in fact serving two traitors to the Empire in your current corporation. The first being of course...
- by Udyr Vulpayne - at 2007.04.25 23:10:00
|
171. Ushra'Khan: Slaves burned by Eden - in Intergalactic Summit [original thread]
Originally by: Kabajashi San They hunted down every single ship that had slaves onboard. If they wanted to fight Matari warriors they would have went for the support, not for the transports. You may want to read the op again with a bit...
- by Udyr Vulpayne - at 2007.04.25 20:24:00
|
172. A call for debate on the Imperial Succession - in Intergalactic Summit [original thread]
Actually it really does matter who participates in a discussion like this. Discussing the matter at hand with a traitor or revans little heretic seems to be comparable to sharing the finer points of your latest security system with a common crimi...
- by Udyr Vulpayne - at 2007.04.25 20:00:00
|
173. A call for debate on the Imperial Succession - in Intergalactic Summit [original thread]
It could be interesting to discuss the situation and speculate how the people in charge of it may decide. However i fail to see what points a traitor to the Empire could bring to the table here.
- by Udyr Vulpayne - at 2007.04.25 18:36:00
|
174. [SF] Week Two War Diary - in Intergalactic Summit [original thread]
Originally by: Jasmine Constantine Incorrect, the problems with the local infrastructure remained very significant for the best part of an hour. were you yourself there and docked or were you in space at the time? of course i cant s...
- by Udyr Vulpayne - at 2007.04.18 16:17:00
|
175. [SF] Week Two War Diary - in Intergalactic Summit [original thread]
Originally by: Jasmine Constantine No we docked because the local communications infrastructure and all electronic systems suffered a massive failure. that is correct. you docked and we left the system for a few minutes to allow ser...
- by Udyr Vulpayne - at 2007.04.18 16:04:00
|
176. [SF] Week Two War Diary - in Intergalactic Summit [original thread]
Originally by: The Cosmopolite Nothing I have said on this subject contradicts previous remarks. We docked for reasons already discussed which did not include the fact that your fleet outnumbered us. Our 10 active pilots (the others atte...
- by Udyr Vulpayne - at 2007.04.18 15:44:00
|
177. [SF] Week Two War Diary - in Intergalactic Summit [original thread]
Originally by: The Cosmopolite I'm not sure what linking to a thread where it is made clear that the Star Fraction fleet did not take the decision to dock due to the greater numbers facing us proves. its merely pointing out what hardi...
- by Udyr Vulpayne - at 2007.04.18 15:18:00
|
178. [SF] Week Two War Diary - in Intergalactic Summit [original thread]
Linkage
- by Udyr Vulpayne - at 2007.04.18 14:34:00
|
179. [SF] Week Two War Diary - in Intergalactic Summit [original thread]
Originally by: Sable Schroedinger Yet, in order to crush an irritation not worthy of your attention who arrogantly claims significance it does not have, you brought 60 ships. Dont worry about it. We wont hold it against you if you de...
- by Udyr Vulpayne - at 2007.04.18 14:13:00
|
180. Operation Judas Goat closes and Operation Slaughterhouse opens - in Intergalactic Summit [original thread]
Oh i'm sorry about adding that period there at the end. meant to do three little dots. I'll fix that and even include a version with the full sentence for you here: Originally by: The Cosmopolite Our pilots were docked and refusing to wa...
- by Udyr Vulpayne - at 2007.04.14 18:25:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 20 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |